---
title: "Hiring Screening with Bias Controls | AimRank"
url: https://www.aimrank.io/products/hiring-screening/
description: "Screen candidates faster, with AI Act and discrimination risk measured, documented and under human control - blind by construction, bias-audited, and a human behind every decision. AI prototype from €1,990."
language: en
updated: 2026-10-09
---

[Products · #09 · Risk & Compliance](https://www.aimrank.io/products/)

TIER A ⚖ ANNEX III HIGH-RISK BLUEPRINT

# Hiring Screening with Bias Controls

Screen candidates faster, with AI Act and discrimination risk measured, documented and under human control - blind by construction, bias-audited, and a human behind every decision.

scaffold from **€1,990**

## How it works

01

### Define job-related criteria

Designed with your recruiters, each criterion documented as job-related - the legal test a discrimination claim will apply.

02

### Blind the pipeline

Name, age, gender, photo, nationality masked before scoring. The model cannot discriminate on what it never sees.

03

### Score with evidence

Skills extracted with citations to the CV; match score with reasons. Borderline candidates route to human review - never auto-reject.

04

### Monitor & document

Adverse-impact dashboard on outcomes, full decision log, candidate transparency note. Audit-ready by default.

## Methodology reference

The published method this build is based on, and what it did in production.

LinkedIn

**LinkedIn** deployed fairness-aware ranking to 100% of LinkedIn Recruiter: \~3× more searches returning representative results.

Fairness-aware ranking · as reported by [arXiv ↗](https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.01989)

Referenced for methodology only. AimRank is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or a customer of these companies; each links to its own public source. Sources last checked September 2026.

## The Four Guarantees™ - this build

The scaffold wires all four in. The PoC proves them on your data, as of that day. Only Implementation keeps them true over time: watched, drift-checked, with recourse.

### Measured value

\~70% screening-time cut at reference volume; eval gate: extraction accuracy + rank agreement with your senior recruiters on a blind set.

### Defensible

Blind by construction; every score traced to CV evidence; Annex III obligation map + decision log; 4/5ths adverse-impact tests documented.

### Self-improving

Adverse impact monitored monthly on outcomes, not just scores; recruiter overrides feed calibration; drift alerts on candidate mix.

### Yours & everywhere

Runs in your cloud, wired to your ATS, full source. MCP endpoint for recruiting copilots - under the same controls.

## The number, sized honestly

Reference buyer: Lithuanian or Baltic employer / staffing agency screening \~200-1,000 CVs per month, with recruiters spending 5-10 minutes per CV on first pass.

**\~70%** first-pass screening time cut - the agreed number (conservative)

**0** auto-rejections - every "no" is a human's decision

**4/5ths** adverse-impact rule monitored monthly on real outcomes

**\~2 mo** payback at the PoC price, reference volume

## Three ways to own it

| Tier | What you get | Price | |
| ---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------- | |
| **Scaffolding** ★ | The full repo - blind-screening pipeline, evidence extractor, adverse-impact harness, Annex III obligation checklist, MCP server. Reference run on synthetic CVs. | **€1,990** | |
| **PoC** ★★RECOMMENDED | Run on your historical CVs and decisions (bias-checked first) - extraction accuracy, rank agreement and adverse impact measured. Code + quality report yours. High-risk domain: evidence before any promise. | from**€6,000** | |
| **Implementation** ★★★ | Production: ATS integration, blind pipeline + human gates enforced, adverse-impact monitoring, retraining under review, AI Act documentation maintained - the agreed number (conservative) attaches here. | from **€18,000**\+ from €900/month assurance | |

★ = engagement depth. **PoC is the recommended path**: quality proven on your data before production money. The PoC carries no performance guarantee by design; the agreed number (conservative) attaches at Implementation, informed by the PoC report.

## What we don't promise

**We won't sell you auto-rejection.** Under the AI Act this is a high-risk system, so the software suggests and documents - humans decide, on every candidate. We also won't promise "bias-free": we promise measured, monitored, and documented, with the adverse-impact numbers reported to you monthly. A vendor promising fully automated, bias-free hiring is selling you a liability.

## Ready to see your own number?

Request the build: within 48h you get a personal reply with the value sized to your volume.

No commitment · reply within 48h · your data stays in the EU