Content Virality Predictor
Predict which draft will perform best - before you post. Calibrated on your audience, not influencer folklore.
THURSDAY SLOT - 3 DRAFTS · 1 GETS PUBLISHED
Variants - predicted lift vs your baseline
"Kaip sutaupėme klientui 40% logistikos kaštų…"
+12% · P10 −4% · P90 +28%
"3 klaidos, kurias daro 9 iš 10 e-shopų…"
+34% · P10 +18% · P90 +52%
"Džiaugiamės pranešti, kad mūsų įmonė…"
−22% · P10 −35% · P90 −8%
Slot decision
PUBLISH B · ranked, with intervals
best window ▸ Thu 18:30 ±45 min · your audience's curve
How it works
Learn your baseline
12 months of your account history via official APIs - what your audience rewards, by format, hook type, time and topic. Your data, not someone's course.
Score variants, not vibes
Hook, structure, thumbnail, length - embedded and ranked against your baseline. Relative lift with P10-P90 intervals, never an absolute "virality score".
The best draft earns the slot
Ranked variants plus your audience's timing curve. Bottom-decile drafts get flagged to kill - a bad post doesn't just flop, it burns reach.
Reality recalibrates
Every published post feeds back. When the platform shifts its algorithm, calibration decays visibly and we flag it - instead of quietly guessing.
The Four Guarantees™ - this build
Measured value
~15-25% engagement uplift on the same content spend at reference volume - the agreed number (conservative), reviewed against actuals monthly.
Defensible
Own-account data via official platform APIs only - no scraping, no pods; every score explainable by feature; Art. 50 AI-disclosure awareness built in.
Self-correcting
Published results recalibrate the model continuously; algorithm shifts surface as visible calibration decay, alerted - not hidden.
Yours & everywhere
Your accounts, your cloud, full source. MCP endpoint - your content copilots score drafts inline while writing.
The number, sized honestly
Reference buyer: Lithuanian or Baltic agency, brand or media team publishing 20-100 pieces a month across LinkedIn, FB/IG, TikTok and YouTube.
Three ways to own it
| Tier | What you get | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scaffolding ★ | The full repo - draft embedding + feature pipeline, ranking model, calibration harness, MCP server. Reference run on public engagement data. | €1,290 | |
| PoC ★★RECOMMENDED | Calibrated on your 12-month account history - rank correlation and interval coverage measured on held-out months. Code + quality report yours. No guarantee - the feed doesn't sign contracts. | from €3,900 | |
| Implementation ★★★ | Production: scoring inside your drafting workflow, continuous recalibration from published results, algorithm-shift alerts, monthly predicted-vs-actual report - the agreed number (conservative) attaches here. | from €12,000 |
★ = engagement depth. PoC is the recommended path: quality proven on your data before production money. The PoC carries no performance guarantee by design; the agreed number (conservative) attaches at Implementation, informed by the PoC report.
What we don't promise
Ready to see your own number?
Request the build: within 48h you get a personal reply with the value sized to your volume.
No commitment · reply within 48h · your data stays in the EU